Advertisement


______________________________________________________

Nick Fleming: RV/GCR Intel Update 8-13-21

0
1751
Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Nicks Intel Update

Updates concerning the RV/GCR

08/13/2021 Update

Our military intel contact said the bill not to block those who have not received the C***D-19 v*********n from traveling internationally and domestically is irrelevant because it will be reversed by DoD white hats just like earlier this past week on Mon 9 Aug, Marine Gen David Berger immediately reversed f**e Biden Secty of Defense Lloyd Austin’s directive that all military personnel receive mandatory vaccinations (https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/08/13/marines-rebuke-defense-secretary-no-mandatory-vaccinations-for-my-marines/ ; this news about Gen Berger is confirmed indirectly by paragraph 20 of this article: https://www.defenseone.com/feature/state-of-defense-2021/ );

. ..He said note what Gen Berger said about Biden and Trump: paragraphs 11-12 of https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/08/13/marines-rebuke-defense-secretary-no-mandatory-vaccinations-for-my-marines/ :

. ““In case you haven’t heard, Biden’s not in charge of the military, and neither are you. You can sell whatever lies you want to the media. You sold your soul, Lloyd, and I hope you can live with yourself,” Gen. Berger said.

[3:08 PM]

. ..Our guy also confirmed Attorney James Bradley’s statement that “[REDACTED]” is a username for a D********e shill, Dan Worley, who is illegally using the name of the Texas State Bar to intimidate Mr. Bradley and Mr. Fleming; Mr [REDACTED] (Mr Worley) needs to know he is being tracked now by military intelligence and is about to be visited by Texas Marshals, other law enforcement, and military police, so he needs to cease and desist immediately; furthermore our guy said Mr Worley’s sentence structure is just as poor as he claims is the case with Mr Fleming—Worley’s so-called sentence separating the conditional particle “if” from the subsequent clause and then following the clause with an ellipsis (…) followed by another conjunctive particle “well” followed by another conditional clause is very poor English indeed—Worley has no grounds to criticize anyone else’s writing when he writes so poorly himself: “If, oddly enough, you did write these posts . . . well, if you would please let me know. . . “; our guy said Worley needs to go back to 11th grade and learn standard English again.

09/13/2021 Podcast Update

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-2c8su-10b4194

RV/GCR

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

If you wish to contact the author of a post, you can send us an email at voyagesoflight@gmail.com and we’ll forward your request to the author (if available). If you have any questions about a post or the website, you may also forward your questions and concerns to the same email address.
______________________________________________________

All articles, videos, and images posted on Dinar Chronicles were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes.

Dinar Chronicles is an informational news aggregator. All content, including third-party reports and community commentary, is provided for educational purposes only. We do not provide financial, legal, or tax advice. We do not recommend the purchase or sale of any currency or investment. Please consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions.

Copyright © Dinar Chronicles

Advertisement


______________________________________________________

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here