Why Does SWIFT Matter in the Russia-Ukraine War?

Swift logo is placed on a Russian flag are seen in this illustration taken, Bosnia and Herzegovina, February 25, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

What is SWIFT, and why does it matter in the Russia-Ukraine war?

Russia has been partly cut off from the SWIFT system for transferring money.

By Sigrid Forberg

In the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, global leaders have been imposing sanctions on the country’s banks, its president, Vladimir Putin, and some of its wealthy oligarchs.

The leaders of the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, the U.K.,, Canada and the U.S. announced in a joint statement on Feb. 26 that they were condemning “Putin’s war of choice” and banning select Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging system. The ban notably excludes Russia’s oil and gas exports.

A SWIFT ban has been called the “nuclear option” in the international community’s confrontation with Putin.

But what is SWIFT? For those who are only just hearing of this for the first time, here’s what you should know about this global financial network, as well as what impact the ban may have on Russia and the world.

Get the latest personal finance news sent straight to your inbox.

We’ll send you top stories and timely advice every Tuesday and Thursday.Sign up

What is SWIFT?

SWIFT, or the Society of Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, is a high-security messaging network for banks and financial institutions. Based in Belgium, it’s sometimes described as the Gmail of global banking.

It was created in 1973, replacing the previous telex system for cross-border payments. The idea was to create a “common language” for banks from all around the world to move money and carry out other transactions.

It has since grown to serve more than 11,000 financial institutions in 200 countries and territories. In 2021, it averaged 42 million messages per day.

Why is that important?

While the network doesn’t hold any assets or actually move money, access to SWIFT means funds can be exchanged between member institutions easily and securely. Other payment systems do exist, but SWIFT dominates the market.

In addition to payment instruction messages, it also transfers messages between institutions relating to everything from the trade of precious metals to traveler’s checks. Its latest report shows categories other than straightforward payments now account for well over half of its transactions.

What does this mean for Russia?

Barring Russian institutions from SWIFT will certainly impact its economy. How much is hard to say, but former finance minister Alexei Kudrin estimated in 2014 that the country’s GDP could shrink by 5% under a SWIFT ban.

That’s likely a low estimate of the damage that would be done if Russia were cut off completely from the SWIFT system.

When Iran was blocked from SWIFT in 2012, it had a massive economic impact on the country. Oil exports reportedly took a sharp dive from more than 2.5 million barrels a day to just one million barrels within two years, and the country lost around 30% of its foreign trade.

The impact of those sanctions are believed to be a key part in what brought Iran to the table in the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement.

Alternative avenues

Analysts have also speculated that Russia may partner with China, which uses its own Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, or CIPS. Or that it may rely on cryptocurrency, or a digital ruble.

Back in January, Nikolai Zhuravlev, the vice speaker of the upper house of Russian parliament, noted that Russia has alternatives to the SWIFT system. After the threat of sanctions in 2014, it began using its own financial messaging system, SPFS, or the System for Transfer of Financial Messages.

While SPFS will cushion the blow of being cut off, it has nowhere near the number of members as SWIFT. According to Russian news agency TASS, SPFS had 400 members as of February 2021, including institutions from Armenia, Belarus, Germany, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland.

Russia’s alternatives are not ideal, says Maria Shagina, a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Eastern European Studies at the University of Zurich. Shagina authored a paper last year analyzing the impacts removing Russia from SWIFT could have.

“Russia is heavily reliant on SWIFT due to its multibillion exports of hydrocarbons denominated in U.S. dollars,” she wrote. “The cutoff would terminate all international transactions, trigger currency volatility and cause massive capital outflows.”

Shagina noted that only 20% of Russia’s domestic transfers are done through SPFS. And since it’s still limited to weekday working hours and transfer sizes are limited, it’s not yet a suitable alternative for most potential users.

However, the SWIFT ban currently only includes seven Russian banks, and excludes its largest lender, Sverbank, and Gazprombank, which are the country’s main channels for payment of Russian oil and gas.

But that volatility Shagina references could still be in the cards as the U.S. and other countries target its energy exports.

Source: MoneyWise


If you wish to contact the author of any reader submitted guest post, you can give us an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com and we’ll forward your request to the author.

All articles, videos, and images posted on Dinar Chronicles were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes.

Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on this site. Information posted on this site may or may not be fictitious. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to readers of this website.

Copyright © 2021 Dinar Chronicles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here