(Note: If you’re looking for more news regarding cryptocurrency, please visit our website Bitcoin Commando. All crypto news will be posted there. ~ Dinar Chronicles)
Seeds of Wisdom
SEC VS RIPPLE: XRP LAWSUIT WRAPPING UP AS NEGOTIATIONS REACH FINAL STAGE—REPORT
Ripple’s high-stakes legal battle with the SEC may soon end, as negotiations reportedly center on vacating a key ruling that imposed a $125 million fine.
SEC vs. Ripple Nears Settlement? Report Suggests a Resolution Is Closer Than Eve
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) case against Ripple regarding the sale of XRP could be nearing its conclusion, according to recent reports. The lawsuit, which has lasted over multiple years, has been a major point of contention in the cryptocurrency industry.
Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on social media platform X on March 12 that two sources indicated the case is in the process of wrapping up and may soon reach a resolution.
“Two well-placed sources tell me that the SEC vs. Ripple case is in the process of wrapping up and could be over soon,” she shared, adding:
My understanding is that the delay in reaching an agreement is due to Ripple’s legal team negotiating more favorable terms regarding the August district court ruling, which imposed a $125M fine on the company and included a permanent injunction preventing the company from selling XRP to institutional investors.
“The argument, I’m told, is that if the new SEC leadership is wiping the enforcement slate clean for all previously-targeted crypto firms because it believes regulatory clarity will resolve the underlying issue, why should Ripple still be penalized?” she explained.
“Accepting the Torres ruling as it stands would mean that Ripple is essentially agreeing to admit to wrongdoing — but now the SEC itself is seemingly unsure whether any wrongdoing occurred.”
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
Terrett noted that Ripple’s argument revolves around the SEC’s shifting stance on cryptocurrency regulation. With new leadership at the agency reportedly reconsidering enforcement actions against crypto firms, Ripple contends that it should not be penalized for alleged past violations.
Since there is no precedent for this kind of legal situation, the case may be taking longer to resolve than other crypto-related enforcement actions.
Earlier this month, lawyer James Murphy, known as Metalawman on X, similarly speculated that the delay may stem from Ripple’s efforts to negotiate vacating Judge Torres’ decision rather than the SEC. While the ruling largely favored XRP holders, he noted that findings of securities law violations and an injunction could hinder Ripple’s future plans, such as an exempt securities offering or an IPO. Murphy suggested the SEC might have agreed to a settlement involving both parties dropping their appeals and Ripple paying a $125 million fine, but Ripple may be seeking better terms.
The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020, alleging it conducted an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP. The case has since become a pivotal legal battle in U.S. cryptocurrency regulation. However, the agency itself is undergoing substantial changes, with many crypto-related enforcement cases, such as those against Coinbase, Kraken, and Robinhood, being dropped.
The regulator’s stance on crypto appears to be shifting following the departure of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Under the new leadership, the SEC has established a task force to reassess its approach to crypto regulation. This shift may have influenced the negotiations between Ripple and the SEC as they work toward a resolution.
@ Newshounds News™
Source: Bitcoin News
~~~~~~~~~
TEXAS DOUBLES DOWN ON CRYPTO WITH NEW $250 MILLION BITCOIN RESERVE BILL
Texas’ second crypto bill seeks to enhance state and local government participation in digital asset investments.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
Texas has introduced a second crypto reserve bill, marking another significant step toward integrating Bitcoin into its financial framework.
According to a document released on March 11, the proposed legislation, HB 4258, seeks to allocate up to $250 million from the state’s economic stabilization fund for Bitcoin and other digital assets.
This marks the second attempt by the state to establish a digital asset reserve, following the earlier SB 778, which recently secured bipartisan support in the Senate.
Unlike the previous proposal, HB 4258 explicitly caps investment and extends participation to municipalities and counties, allowing them to allocate up to $10 million to digital assets. If approved and signed into law, the bill would take effect on Sept. 1, 2025.
Texas’ push for a Bitcoin reserve aligns with broader trends across the US, where 21 states are exploring similar frameworks at different legislative stages. Some states have active proposals, while others are still conducting evaluations.
President of the Texas Blockchain Council, Lee Bratcher, highlighted the state’s strategic position for Bitcoin adoption. He pointed to the Texas Triangle—Houston (energy), Austin (tech), and Dallas (capital markets)—as a convergence of industries that makes Bitcoin integration particularly viable.
Texas’ first Bitcoin bill
As previously stated, SB 778 focuses on integrating crypto into the state’s financial system by enabling tax payments and donations in digital assets.
It also seeks to impose a five-year restriction on selling state-owned Bitcoin. With Senate approval secured, the bill awaits a decision in the Texas House, expected by May 24.
Meanwhile, support for the initiative has been strong, with Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick calling the establishment of a Bitcoin reserve a strategic move that could set an example for other states.
He emphasizedBitcoin’s decentralized nature and finite supply, describing it as a valuable asset for Texas’ financial future. Patrick added:
“President Trump has stated unequivocally that he intends to make the United States the cryptocurrency capital of the world. His visionary leadership on Bitcoin and digital assets has paved the way for rapid American innovation, and Texas is leading the way.”
@ Newshounds News™
Source: CryptoSlate
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
~~~~~~~~~
Source: Dinar Recaps
=======================================
SENATE BANKING COMMITTEE VOTES TO ADVANCE STABLECOIN BILL, COLLECTING SUPPORT FROM BOTH D-------S AND REPUBLICANS
▪️ The bill would establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins and create standards for when stablecoin issuers would be regulated by the state or the federal government.
▪️ Some D-------s, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, have expressed unease toward the bill.
The Senate Banking Committee voted to advance a monumental stablecoin bill, advancing it to the full Senate and gaining support from D-------s along the way.
Introduced in February by Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., the “GENIUS Act” (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins) aims to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins, defining when issuers fall under state or federal oversight. It has bipartisan support from D--------c Sens. Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York. D-------s Sens. Mark Warner and Andy Kim were among others to support the bill.
“The GENIUS Act is a bipartisan step forward in ensuring stablecoins are safe and reliable tools in the financial system,” said Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., at the beginning of Thursday’s markup.
A handful of lawmakers in Washington have worked on a bill to regulate stablecoins for years, but those efforts, like other crypto-related bills to regulate the industry, have not come to fruition.
Now, almost two months into Donald Trump’s presidency, Congress is seemingly prioritizing crypto, including investigating claims of industry-wide debanking and repealing the controversial “DeFi Broker rule.”
Work is also underway in the House to regulate stablecoins. Though the GENIUS Act is not a companion to the House’s version, lawmakers say it shows an effort among Republicans to work on key issues.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
The GENIUS Act has garnered support from some in the crypto industry, including the Blockchain Association which called the bill “a thoughtful step forward for commonsense, response guardrails for stablecoin innovation,” in a post on X on Wednesday.
On the other side of the aisle, some D-------s have expressed unease toward the GENIUS Act. Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s staff circulated a memo outlining their opposition to the bill, which they say “fails” to protect consumers, competition and national security, according to Politico. The memo also includes arguments that the bill would allow firms, such as big tech companies, to issue their own currencies, Fortune reported.
Warren offered several amendments on Thursday, including one involving firms being able to issue their own stablecoins. Big tech billionaires like Elon Musk could use their own currencies to compete with the U.S. dollar, Warren said.
“My most pressing concern is Elon Musk’s attempt to build an empire that rivals the power of most nation states,” Warren later added.
In the past, some D-------s have been critical of companies’ previous plans to launch a stablecoin. Meta Platforms, formerly Facebook, looked to launch stablecoin Libra, later renamed Diem, a few years ago, but quickly prompted concern among regulators and lawmakers who were hesitant about a stablecoin with ties to the social media company.
The committee voted 13-11, therefore not agreeing to Warren’s amendment.
Tensions flare
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto raised concerns over D-------s showing up to the markup and holding a quorum for the committee but not Republicans.
“We’re taking the time to talk about our amendments, but there’s no debate,” the Nevada D------t said. “And there’s some very good amendments here by the way, and I’m hopeful that we have a good product coming out of here, but it is the D-------s now holding the quorum here instead of the Republicans.“
Cortez Masto called the bill a “great start” but said it was not ready for prime time.
“There are many that want to provide a good product at the end of the day, but it looks like to me — the die is already cast, you get what you get,” she said.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
Sen. Warren called the markup a “show trial” and criticized the lack of debate. However, Warren also showed willingness to work on the bill and said it had a “strong base.”
“This feels like show trial here that we get up and we read our little part about each of the amendments and the Republicans, clearly a majority of the Republicans have already decided their vote without even hearing anyone make an argument for why this might be an amendment that would be appropriate for this bill,” Warren said.
Sen. Bill Hagerty, one of the authors of the bill, countered and said the bill had gone through a “very robust bipartisan process.”
“We’re going to continue to work to improve this,” he said. “I’ve already acknowledged my willingness to do that here today to the extent that there are additional technical corrections, or in many cases, valid issues are being raised that I think are far more appropriate for a market structure piece of legislation.”
In the House, Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., criticized the GENIUS Act on Tuesday during a hearing focused on stablecoins and said it needed to be amended “vigorously.”
“I read the GENIUS Act over in the Senate — I’m a little weary about anything called genius coming out of the United States Senate — but there were so many problems with that and I’m hopeful, hopefully my colleagues, Mr. Hill, and others will amend that vigorously because it had huge, huge problems,” Lynch said
@ Newshounds News™
Source: The Block
~~~~~~~~~
TREASURY MET WITH THREE CRYPTO FIRMS TO DECIDE CUSTODY OF BITCOIN RESERVE
Firms including Anchorage Digital are advising the U.S. government on best practices for safeguarding billions of dollars worth of crypto assets.
The U.S. Treasury Department held meetings this week with top executives from three crypto custody firms to discuss safeguarding the country’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, sources familiar with the matter told Decrypt.
Anchorage Digital was one such custodian that met with Treasury Department officials on Monday, according to multiple sources with direct knowledge of the matter.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
When asked about the meeting, Anchorage CEO Nathan McCauley told Decrypt thatgovernment officials asked him detailed questions about best practices for custodying a national Bitcoin reserve and digital asset stockpile. McCauley said the officials also inquired about how custody could impact stablecoins and market structure, two hot-button topics currently before Congress.
“The Treasury Department is asking all the right questions,” the Anchorage CEO told Decrypt. “It’s clear that Treasury officials are treating this move into the digital asset space with care, recognizing that the United States is quite literally writing history.”
The Treasury Department did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
A Capitol Hill source with knowledge of the meetings told Decrypt the Treasury Department is in the early stages of figuring out how best to tackle questions of security involved in the U.S. government indefinitely holding billions of dollars worth of digital assets.
“I don’t think they have a view yet, and they’re trying to figure out what their view is going to be,” they said. “But they are actively seeking additional information from industry participants on the best way to custody the strategic reserve and the stockpile.”
The source elaborated that key decision makers in the industry appear to be in favor of one or multiple third parties assisting with custodying the U.S. government’s Bitcoin reserve in the interim, with the long-term goal of the government eventually self-custodying when ready.
Self custody refers to the practice of independently holding crypto in cold wallets accessed with private keys, as opposed to relying on third parties to manage the assets.
The national digital assets stockpile, however, will consist of a wide variety of seized crypto assets on various blockchain networks, and therefore will likely be permanently custodied by a third party.
How are the nearly 200,000 BTC in the government’s possession currently being held? Last summer, the U.S. Marshals Service announced it had tapped Coinbase to custody its large cap digital asset holdings.
When asked by Decrypt whether the company currently custodies the U.S. government’s Bitcoin, however, a Coinbase representative declined comment, pointing only to a recent, vague X post on the subject by Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
In the post, Armstrong boasts that his company “works with 145 government entities in the U.S. and 29 government entities outside the U.S.” and that Coinbase has seen increased interest in its custody services following President Donald Trump’s announcement establishing a Bitcoin Reserve.
During an event in Washington held Tuesday by the Bitcoin Policy Institute, BitGo CEO Mike Belshe, Casa CEO Nick Neuman, and Anchorage Digital’s Nathan McCauley convened a panel on “Safeguarding America’s Bitcoin.”
During the talk, the executives opined as to the current state of the government’s current BTC stash, which is worth some $16.4 billion at writing.
“It’s maybe sitting in a closet at the U.S. Marshals Office,” Casa’s Neuman said.
“Or in a drive at somebody’s desk,” BitGo’s Mike Belshe added.
@ Newshounds News™
Source: Decrypt
~~~~~~~~~
Source: Dinar Recaps
______________________________________________________
If you wish to contact the author of a post, you can send us an email at voyagesoflight@gmail.com and we’ll forward your request to the author (if available). If you have any questions about a post or the website, you may also forward your questions and concerns to the same email address.
______________________________________________________
All articles, videos, and images posted on Dinar Chronicles were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes.
Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on this site. Information posted on this site may or may not be fictitious. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to readers of this website.
Copyright © Dinar Chronicles
