Recent discussion about the BRICS+ nations potentially creating a common currency to rival the US dollar has sparked considerable debate. President-elect Donald Trump fueled the fire with a strong warning, threatening “100 percent tariffs” on BRICS+ nations if they attempt to circumvent the dollar’s dominance. He stated on social media that allowing BRICS to move away from the dollar “while we stand by and watch is over,” indicating a hard-line stance against any attempt to challenge the US currency’s global power.
The BRICS+ bloc, originally consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, has recently expanded to include Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE. With the potential addition of Saudi Arabia, the group is poised to become a dominant force in commodities trading, controlling a staggering 42% of global oil production and 35% of total oil consumption.
While Trump’s alarming rhetoric suggests an imminent threat to the dollar, financial analysts argue that a BRICS+ currency is far from being a reality in the immediate future. Despite increased chatter regarding alternatives to the dollar, these experts point out the numerous hurdles that impede the creation and implementation of a common currency within the diverse bloc.
“The BRICS+ currency is a far-fetched idea,” says Herbert Poenisch, senior fellow at Zhejiang University and former senior economist at the Bank for International Settlements. He believes Trump’s statement is primarily targeted toward a domestic audience.
Poenisch further emphasizes that even Russian President V------------n acknowledged at the Kazan summit just two months ago that a common BRICS+ currency is still “years away,” stating there were “no plans to create a special system” for cross-border payments among BRICS+ economies.
The core issue, according to experts, lies in the sheer diversity and lack of homogeneity among BRICS+ members. The Eurozone, a successful example of a common currency, benefits from a group of 20 relatively homogenous countries with a strong political will to cede monetary autonomy, with Germany acting as a de facto “paymaster.” BRICS+, on the other hand, lacks a similar unifying force or a nation willing to shoulder the financial burden and leadership role. China, often seen as the most likely candidate, appears unwilling to take on this responsibility for a common currency.
This raises a critical question: Why is the dollar the dominant currency in the first place? The dollar’s dominance is rooted in a combination of factors, including the size and stability of the US economy, its role as the world’s reserve currency, and the widespread use of the dollar in international trade and finance.
In conclusion, while the idea of a BRICS+ currency continues to generate headlines and provoke strong reactions like Trump’s warning, the reality on the ground suggests that it remains a distant and challenging prospect. The internal complexities and lack of consensus within the bloc, coupled with the inherent strength and entrenched position of the US dollar, make a near-term challenge extremely unlikely. While the discussions surrounding de-dollarization are likely to persist, a viable and widely accepted alternative to the dollar is still a long way off.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
Watch the video below from Geopolitical Analyst for more information.
______________________________________________________
If you wish to contact the author of a post, you can send us an email at voyagesoflight@gmail.com and we’ll forward your request to the author (if available). If you have any questions about a post or the website, you may also forward your questions and concerns to the same email address.
______________________________________________________
All articles, videos, and images posted on Dinar Chronicles were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes.
Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on this site. Information posted on this site may or may not be fictitious. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to readers of this website.
Copyright © Dinar Chronicles
