The global financial crisis of 2008 exposed vulnerabilities in the banking system, leading to the creation of Basel III. Designed to fortify the global banking system, Basel III aimed to prevent future crises by imposing higher capital and funding costs on assets deemed riskier or less liquid. However, one surprising casualty of this rigorous framework has been the traditional role of gold within commercial banking portfolios.
At its core, Basel III sought to create a more resilient financial landscape. This meant increasing the stability of banks by ensuring they held sufficient capital to absorb potential losses and had adequate liquidity to meet their obligations. This framework imposes heightened capital and funding requirements on assets deemed riskier or less liquid. Curiously, within this rigorous framework, gold found itself categorized as a “less liquid” asset. This classification immediately introduces significant liquidity costs, making it inherently more expensive for banks to hold.
The most impactful change, however, came with the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). Even when gold was securely allocated and held, Basel III assigned it a substantial 85 percent funding requirement under the NSFR. This marked a dramatic departure from its treatment under previous regulatory frameworks like Basel II, fundamentally altering the economics of holding gold. For any large commercial bank, maintaining significant gold positions essentially became economically unviable, if not “nearly unworkable,” due to these prohibitive costs and capital charges. The rationale being that even highly liquid assets require stable funding sources.
Yet, as major Western banks find themselves effectively deterred from accumulating substantial gold reserves, a contrasting trend emerges from the East. Gold-producing powerhouses like China and Russia have skillfully navigated these regulatory waters. Leveraging their unique positions as primary producers and perhaps national regulatory flexibilities, these nations have been actively amassing significant gold reserves. This divergence creates a fascinating geopolitical dynamic, where the West’s financial regulations discourage gold accumulation by its commercial banks, while key players in the East are strategically strengthening their reserves.
The treatment of gold under Basel III presents a paradox: an asset historically viewed as a safe haven and store of value is now burdened with significant costs for banks. This regulatory shift raises questions about the long-term implications for global financial systems, the role of central banks versus commercial banks in gold holdings, and the evolving power dynamics in the international monetary landscape.
For a deeper dive into these complex financial mechanics and their broader implications, watch the full video from Miles Harris for further insights and information.
______________________________________________________
If you wish to contact the author of a post, you can send us an email at voyagesoflight@gmail.com and we’ll forward your request to the author (if available). If you have any questions about a post or the website, you may also forward your questions and concerns to the same email address.
______________________________________________________
All articles, videos, and images posted on Dinar Chronicles were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes.
Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on this site. Information posted on this site may or may not be fictitious. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to readers of this website.
Copyright © Dinar Chronicles
